Comments on: ScotchBuilder with Scala 2.8 http://log4p.com/2009/12/23/scotchbuilder-with-scala-2-8/ Peter Maas's Weblog Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:48:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: peter http://log4p.com/2009/12/23/scotchbuilder-with-scala-2-8/comment-page-1/#comment-95048 peter Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:33:30 +0000 http://log4p.com/?p=720#comment-95048 You are right. Both cases. I will need to revise my refactor; I simplified the validation part way to much. You are right. Both cases. I will need to revise my refactor; I simplified the validation part way to much.

]]> By: Erik van Oosten http://log4p.com/2009/12/23/scotchbuilder-with-scala-2-8/comment-page-1/#comment-95046 Erik van Oosten Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:32:38 +0000 http://log4p.com/?p=720#comment-95046 Another drawback of this solution is that problems without a good set of default values can not be expressed this way due to the validation check in the constructor. BTW, I think the IllegalStateException should be an IllegalArgumentException :) Another drawback of this solution is that problems without a good set of default values can not be expressed this way due to the validation check in the constructor.

BTW, I think the IllegalStateException should be an IllegalArgumentException :)

]]>